Magazine Notes High-Stakes Court Cases
Mother Jones magazine is offering a rundown on five states where electing state supreme court justices has become a high-stakes political battle, complete with spending millions of dollars on attack and counter-attack ads. The piece offers some familiar names for anyone who follows the judicial policy wars, like Texas and North Carolina, and some places where you might not have noticed conflict, like Tennessee.
In particular, the magazine notes that Florida, also home to significant fights over the governorās office and of course a vital presidential swing state, has seen dramatic increases. Florida, says reporter A.J. Vicens,Ā āā¦ ranked near the bottom of the list between 2000-09 in terms of judicial candidate contributions, with nomineesĀ raising just $7,500 during that entire period. But thatĀ changedĀ in the 2011-12 cycle, when three Supreme Court judges were up for retention votes, with candidate fundraising coming in at more than $1.5 million and independent spending topping $3.1 million.ā
For court watchers, it may be interesting that the increased spending is happening in some states with āretentionā models, which are believed to decrease political efforts in the judiciary. In those states, voters can only decide whether or not to keep or dismiss a judge ā as opposed to choosing between candidates. California, for example, uses a retention system for its high court, although a huge majority of lower court judges run unopposed.
Read the Mother Jones take here:Ā These states are witnessing big-money slugfestsāto elect judges